"White Supremacists" Are Not The "Biggest Threat" To "Our Democracy"
The biggest threat to the nation is almost certainly the progressive/PC left and the Democratic party. I've certainly never seen such a threat--not since the Cold War, anyway. The blue team now--in an important sense--is a bigger threat than either radical Islamism or the CCP. It's most dangerous, of course, because this threat is internal--and because it's not some group of peripheral dissenters. These people now largely control most or all of the levers of power at most or all of our major institutions.
Invalid...but Westernstraightwhitemale hegemonic racist shit like logic doesn't matter to our new transrational overlords.
Oh: among the many things I used to be wrong about: Merrick Garland. Once again we see that Mitch McConnell is often the only thing standing between us and disaster.
I just flat-out assert that the claim in the title is false. In fact, it could be true. But: (a) we've been given no reason to believe that it is; (b) the progressive-left has a long track record of lying about such things; (c) it's extremely difficult to believe that any domestic group could rival the carnage being perpetrated against the republic by the left; (d) "white supremacist" is not just another leftist neologism with no determinate meaning.
As for (d): "white supremacist" is another linguistic fad on the left--just not just that. It has purposes. It seemed to begin as yet another terminological escalation--it just meant "white racist"...but sounded satisfyingly (to the blues) worse. Also, they probably don't just want to say 'racist' because not everyone has been taught Crazy Left Dogma 4.5.5.7: All and only whites are racist. So if they just say 'racist', somebody might get the wrong idea and not realize that they're talking about all and only whites. OTOH, if they say 'white racist,' that overtly suggests that there are nonwhite racists. Mainly, though: this jargon lets them suggest that we're all basically Klansmen. It also--a standard leftist strategy--make tactical equivocation possible. It kinda means, y'know, actual white supremacists--Klansmen and the like--but kinda also just means Trump supporters. So they can say things like "White supremacists attacked the Capitol". Like so: They were Trump supporters, ergo they were white supremacists ergo they were Klansmen and the like.
Anyway: also the Proud Boys are not white supremacists. They're not even merely racists. I don' think the Oath Keepers are, either...but I don't know much about them.
The real point of this is:
All Trump supporters are "white supremacists""White supremacists" pose the biggest terrorism threat to the USATherefore:Trump supporters post the biggest terrorism threat to the USA.
The point is advancing the Gleichschaltung.
The FBI et al. undoubtedly have evidence we don't have. But they're known to have been converged. We have no reason to believe that they're telling the truth, and plenty of reason to believe that this is part of the Democrats' push to (disastrously) re-engineer the nation. It's part of the barbed-wire-and-National-Guard crisis theater that the Dems have staged in D.C. It's yet another way to control the citizenry via fear--by fabricating/exaggerating some horrific threat. The right did it with WMDs, the left is doing it with...well. all sorts of things: climate apocalypticism, genocidal cops, race hysteria generally.
The claim in the title is a lie.
I could be wrong, but I'm not.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home