Wednesday, January 19, 2011
Previous Posts
- Don Surber, Stupid Asshole Via Balloon Juice, he...
- Reaganboner I hate just reposting stuff from Sull...
- The Battle Hymn of Sarah Palin At Sullivan's digs...
- Boycott Pseudo-Buffy So the last word I'd heard w...
- 17 Years in Prison for Rape He Did Not Commit...Fr...
- Our First Black President--Ronald Reagan As you k...
- Tech Crushes Carolina Wow. Word is that Ga Tech i...
- Choose Your ACC Basketball TeamAt Seth Curry Saves...
- Carolina Best Value in Public Colleges (For the Te...
- Perception Check: CNN on Global Gun LawsQuestion: ...
Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]
4 Comments:
I get the opposite out of that:
55% of students do learn useful skills in college, and 66% are required to write 20+ page reports.
I certainly learned some valuable things in college that I would not have discovered otherwise. (E.g., training in statistical mechanics and chemistry has proven valuable in a carreer in software engineering.)
-mac
LOL--totally right, mac... Why didn't I notice that?
Yeah, well, it's hard to go wrong with math and science...it's mostly everybody else I worry about...
There's some rotten-cherry-picking going on in the AP report. After four years, 64% have made significant gains. That's bad, but it's not as bad as the story wants us to think.
It does suggest that more college attendance may not be a magic bullet. (Of course, it would be great if policy-makers realized that there are no magic bullets.)
Agreed...in my defense, I intentionally said that the study concluded that there was little learning, explicitly not endorsing or rejecting the conclusion. A friend sent me the whole report. But 45% showing no significant improvement is pretty damn bad, no matter what the rest of the data looks like...or so I assert.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home