Turley: Dems Have To Scrap Obstruction Stuff

As for the substance: well, if the charges really do amount roughly to: we're accusing you of exercising your legal right to ask the courts...then yeah, that's almost got to be crap.
   Though, of course: it's not supposed to matter that you have one or two or ten or a hundred crap arguments, is it? So long as you have a good one somewhere? I assumed that the Dem strategy was: give 'em both barrels--our powder ain't gettin' any drier... Same with the early Pub arguments about the need for an underlying crime. Sounded weak to me, but why not lay them down in case anyone buys them? Especially when more than half the quasi-jury wants to buy them?