Wednesday, March 22, 2017
Previous Posts
- Swiss Gun Groups Oppose New EU Gun Restrictions
- Prager "University": If There Is No God, Then Murd...
- Greg Sargent: Trump's Non-Stop Lies Are Failing Him
- Elizabeth Warren Questions Hiring Of For-Profit-Co...
- Trump's Weary Defenders Face Fresh Worries
- "Hate Crime" Hoax: Jewish Man Paints Swastika On H...
- Comey: Trump Is Lying About Wiretaps; Investigatio...
- Trump Approval Rating 37%
- Carolina 72 - Arkansas 65
- Carolina 103 - Texas Southern 64
Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]
1 Comments:
Yeah, that's astonishingly ignorant--it completely ignores the actual history of food, where the 'colonialism' was lead by the food rather than by the colonists. Successful crops spread incredibly quickly, even where there was no colonialism--just by trade. And as often as not, the local cuisine was adopted by the colonists--just look at Israeli food.
But I did think of an example of decolonized food: French fusion Vietnamese. The French got the boot, so the food left behind is by definition 'decolonized.'
Or how about Indian food adapted for the British market? India was a colony. Now there's significant migration the other direction, leading to another decolonial cuisine.
But somehow, I suspect this is not what the original assignment was aimed at...
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home