Anarchists Responsible For the Berkeley Anti-Milo Riot?

link

I don't find it implausible that anarchists committed most of the assaults and property destruction. But that's not really the most important part of what went on. Consider:

People have taken advantage of the Berkeley spirit of free speech to use it to advance their own agenda for a national audience.

   But: even ignoring the violence, what the students were trying to do was shut down the talk. That's what's become of "the Berkeley spirit of free speech." To pretend that the demonstration was simply an expression of free speech and not also an effort to deny someone else the opportunity to speak--that's just a lie. Perhaps the anarchists were worse (perhaps not): what the students were doing was bad enough.
   And, of course: this isn't an isolated occurrence. The PC left is powerful on campuses (but not only there), and it is opposed to free inquiry and free expression.