Tuesday, June 03, 2025

Hirsanyi: "We Have No Constitutional or Moral Duty to Subsidize Harvard"


Also: it's a good idea to withhold funding from highly-politicized, ideologically captured departments and programs--which are generally those with low intellectual standards. The more ideologically captured and less rigorous a department is, the less valuable and more dangerous it is. Sociology is a good example. It has been firmly captured by the left, to such a point that one of the hottest debates in the discipline concerns whether it should mainly be scientific or mainly be activist. Other examples include almost all the "x-studies" programs and departments--women's-, gender-, queer-, black/African-American-, "Latinx-," "post-colonial-," and on and on.
   There is just about no reason at all for the U.S. government to fund academic programs dedicated to promoting bad reasoning and politically biased anti-liberal/anti-American/anti-Western attitudes. If these programs were intellectually rigorous and/or were producing actual knowledge, the question of funding might be a difficult one. But they are not. Anyone who has interacted with students and "scholars" in such disciplines know that their "arguments" rarely rise about "that's racist." Students who major in such disciplines often come out of college reasoning less well than they went into it, when at least they were guided mainly by common sense. What they learn is little more than extremist ideological nonsense. The "method," such as it is, is to seek out tenuous, free-associative, often accidental linguistic or metaphorical connections between non-leftist arguments and anything that might be interpreted as bigoted, no matter how implausible the connection might be. An actual example from Andrea Nye's Word of Power: A Feminist Reading of the History of Logic: logicians speak of "chains of arguments." Chains are used to enslave. Therefore logic is oppressive. Another from the same source: bad arguments are said to be invalid. 'Invalid,' if pronounced with emphasis on the first syllable, means a disabled person. Therefore, logic is "ableist"... This is not a strawman. This is, in fact, an extremely influential method of "reasoning" on the academic left.
   Of course anyone can learn to simply say "that's racist" in response to every challenge. It's a lot easier than actually learning to reason. Students who learn to "reason" in this way not only fail to learn to actually reason, they learn to replace actual thought and reasoning with mindless, rote nonsense. Left to their own devices, they'd likely be at least average reasoners. Instead, they are trained to be stupid.
   But, as Hirsanyi notes, it would be very difficult to withhold money only from such disciplines. Money, being fungible, can be shuffled around behind the scenes. So I don't pretend that such an approach is likely to work--I'm just saying it would be good if it did.
   Again I'll note: I'm not wild about the approach of the Trump administration. But we are facing the possibility not merely of the destruction of the university, one of mankind's greatest institutions, but, worse, of its transformation into a tool of Orwellian totalitarianism.
   The Trump administration is, again, the lesser evil.
   Though, of course, I could be wrong.

Olympic Boxer Imane Khalif Is, Indeed, Male

Gerard Baker: "Which is Worse, Trump or Harvard?"

Like Baker, my answer is: Harvard.

Trump is bad; Harvard is worse.

Obviously, I might be wrong.

Monday, June 02, 2025

Boulder Molotov Cocktail / "Flamethrower" Anti-Israel Terrorist Is Illegal Alien Admitted Under Biden

It basically wouldn't be possible for a single small event to more poignantly illustrate the madness of the worldview of the contemporary progressive left.

Ukrainian Drone Attack Lays Waste To Up To 40 (!!) Russian Strategic Bombers

This is just amazing.
...and they ain't makin' no more a' them Tu-95s ner Tu-22s... Reports say the Ukrainians took out 40 of Ivan's remaining Bears. Ukraine says that Russia hasn't made a single, whole, brand new strategic bomber since the USSR fell. We can infer that they're not going to start now...
   Sounds absolutely devastating.
   One of these strikes was 3,000 miles from Ukraine!
   Story says $2 billion in damage...but honestly, I'd have guessed more. These things are basically irreplaceable.
   Seems to me that one of the main goals is to make Putin less likely to continue this and less likely to pull such a thing in the future...and this operation is bound to do those things.

Sunday, June 01, 2025

Youngkin's Vetos Dozens of Leftist Anti-Firearm Bills

Old news, but not sure I ever said anything about it.
   NoVa (and VA Beach...and Charlottesville...and, increasingly, Harrisonburg...) are wrecking the OD.

   But mostly NoVa.

   I was kind of hoping that Trump would go through with the threats to disperse the physical locations of government agencies across the country... Just make sure to disperse them into states where they won't tilt the place blue. NoVa is like a cancer on the Commonwealth, politically speaking.

   I actually tend to agree with some of the Dem bills--e.g. making parents/guardians responsible for leaving firearms accessible to minors with histories of violence.
   But, of course, none of the bills actually increased penalties for the actual people who actually commit violence--because laws against violence are racist, racist.
   In general, however, my view is: do not give an inch to the Democrats on any anti-firearm legislation. Because every step down that road is a beachhead. They will never be satisfied, they will never stop, until all guns are outlawed. Compromising with them is just conceding to them. It just brings them that much closer to their ultimate, totalitarian goal.
   We know what they want the country to be like--and we know they can't accomplish that without eliminating firearms. If they manage to undermine the Second Amendment, the First is next.
   The bills they really wanted to pass were the ones Youngkin vetoed--e.g. outlawing AR-15s, mags that hold more than 10 rounds, etc. etc. The whole standard (lets be honest) commie wish list of anti-Second-Amendment stuff.
   Good on Governor Youngkin--who's been just great--for vetoing this totalitarian bullshit.
   
   I just resolved not to buy any more guns this year...but, upon reflection, I'm questioning that decision...

Here We Go Again: Deported Australian Army Wife Story Isn't As Simple As The MSM Reported It

Every time a story like this--which is, really, just a minor variation on the Orange Man Bad theme--pops up, I kinda fall for it...despite knowing that we're probably not getting the straight dope. When the actual facts (often eventually) do come out, they're generally far less blue-friendly than we were initially told.
This one, it seems, is no exception.

Another Trump Freakout: Burning Bridges With Leonard Leo and the Federalist Society

As I--and many others--said during his first term: dude just does not have the temperament to be President.
IMO this is not a small problem.
   As I also said during his first term: somebody needs to wrest his phone from him. He needs somebody sensible to be in charge of filtering his Twixxer (etc.) posts.
   I mean, that won't solve the temperament problem...but at least it would knock the sharpest edges off his public statements.
   I'm glad we avoided the worse/worst option in November. But I'm not all that happy with our second-worst option.

New PC Shrieking Points Drop: ELON KILLED 300K PEOPLE Z0MG

Link is to the American "Thinker"...which is devoutly conservative on every issue. But it's the links that are important.
   If we were gonna play this game, the biggest murder and misery tally would--given the lefties' rules--probably have to go to Biden's open borders policy. Not only are people dying and getting kidnapped and raped on the journey, but they all end up in the USA, the epicenter of world racism and other -ism-based evil and general awfulness. AND the carbon footprint of each person who moves from south of the border into the U.S. grows by something like an order of magnitude, thus hastening the Looming Carbon Apocalypse...
   But, anyway.
   All very stupid--but predictable.

Friday, May 30, 2025

Trump Pardons Two FL Divers Who Were Innocent and Maliciously Prosecuted

" 'Banal Horror' Asylum Case Deals Trump Yet Another Loss on Due Process"

Jenkins: "Why Is Policymaking So Bad?"

Eisenhower Warned Us About a "Scientific-Technological Elite;" And: Could Cutting Funding for University Research Improve Science?


Thursday, May 29, 2025

Trump Pardons Right-Wing Crooks Todd and Julie Chrisley, Who Defrauded Community Banks Out of $Tens of Millions

When he's dumb, he's very, very dumb.

WhatIfAltHist: We Live in a Totalitarian Society

 

CO Passes Another Crazy "Gender" Law: "Misgendering" and "Deadnaming" Both Illegal

Abject insanity.

Even if "gender" (in the leftist senses of the term) made any sense--which, not to put too fine a point on it, it does not--the state can't compel to you say this sort of thing. I can't change my name and then insist that no one else ever use my old name again--and, contrary to progressive dogma, transes are not special.
   The court would have to be insane to uphold such a law.

WhatIfAltHist: "WTF is The Left Even Doing?" aka "Is the Left OK?"

Most of this is old news to readers of this blogtastic blog. But it is, IMO, interesting, enjoyable, and even comforting to listen to someone who so has the left's number:

"Trump's War on Gender is Also a War on Government:" Transanity by Paisley Currah. Also: Anti-Transanity by Noah Rothman

This was just too flat-out stupid for me to finish.

But Noah Rothman's gotcher back: "The Addled Activist Mind."

NRO: Tariff Power Lies With Congress, Not the President

The decisive argument, IMO:
We have been frequent critics of Donald Trump’s tariffs, but we understand that there is a case to be made for reconsidering some of our trade policies. The place to make that case is Congress — not by unilateral presidential declaration of open-ended worldwide “emergencies.” The Founders rebelled against taxation without representation; they did not mean for the executive to control the duties on all imports by daily whim.
It is Congress that was granted power by the Constitution to “lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises” and to “regulate Commerce with foreign Nations,” and for good reason. It is Congress that can set policies that are stable and predictable for business, our allies, and our adversaries. The representative branch’s policymaking may not be pretty, but it includes the greatest number of people in the most deliberative fashion in balancing competing policy concerns and getting buy-in from people likely to face the voters again soon. That’s how we have always set tax policy, and tariffs are nothing if not taxes.
...
From here, the case likely goes to the federal circuit and, quite possibly, the Supreme Court. It would be better in all events for Trump to go to Congress instead, or for Congress to act on its own. But if the president persists in claiming worldwide, perpetual powers unconstrained by any specific rules, it will be the duty of the judiciary to stand against taxation without proper representation. It would be better still if the courts made clear that no Congress can give such powers away.

Free Speech Prevails Against the Loathsome Michael Mann / Global Warming Hysteria

I am, of course, not a lawyer, but Mann's case always seemed preposterous to me.

Lowry: The Woke Frenzy Isn't Coming Back

Contra Lowry: the woke frenzy isn't even gone.

The only reason someone might think it is is: it was a lot worse for a few years there.

But: Woketarianism still reigns at universities and in K-12, it's still got a grip on "journalism" and many or most other institutions, boys are still cosplaying girls and invading their sports, locker rooms and public restrooms, men are still cosplaying women and invading their sports, locker rooms and public restrooms, the influence of CRT and BLM on laws, policing, prosecution and imprisonment are still evident. Rabid pro-Hamasniks ravening through campuses and cities is a new phase of the madness.

As I've said many times: Woketarianism was Political Correctness 2.0--neo-PC. Paleo-PC reigned in universities--and began to invade "journalism"--in the late '80s. But by the late '90s it had faded away. Those of us who thought we'd won the war were wrong, wrong, wrong. It festered in the intellectually weakest parts of the academy, and burst forth into the wider culture ca. 2013. People older than me have said: it's the New Left 3.0...

Don't expect this madness to ever go away completely. Like extreme right-wing Christianity, it'll likely just come and go for a long, long time.

Daniel Buck: Woke Education is Going Strong, Even in Middle America

My prediction is that this is unlikely to completely go away. The left has moved the Overton Window. And this kind of prope-Marxist / postpostmodern, Orwellian irrationalism is likely to come and go for a long, long time. It never really went away after it seized control of campuses in the late '80s. It just waned...and then waxed...explosively.

Wednesday, May 28, 2025

Stanley Kurtz: Harvard IS Illegitimate; A Reply to Steven Pinker

I agree...but it's not just Harvard.
It's most of academia.

Gabe Kaminsky: Trump Family Business Dealings Test Ethical and Legal Boundaries

Sounds really damn bad.
   But, in Trump's case, you just about have to suspend judgment until you've heard a defense. The left spins absolutely everything Trump does in the worst possible direction. I don't see how the stuff referenced in the story can be ok...but that's the thing: over and over, the press reports on things Trump does in such a way as for them to sound utterly indefensible...but when you learn the actual facts, you see you've been duped.
   Which, again, isn't to say that I'm confident this stuff will turn out to be defensible in the end.
   I guess it's possible that he thinks he's justified in getting back the money that Democrats stole from him in those lawsuits. And honestly, that's not an abjectly stupid idea--though probably not legally defensible. He could also be building resources because he thinks he'll face another psychopathic effort to ruin him and his family when he leaves office again. A pretty slender thread of a justification...but I'm just spitballin' here...

Monday, May 26, 2025

Gabe Kaminsky: How Elon Musk Unleashed Chaos in the NIH

This stuff concerns me a lot--and, presumably, concerns a lot of people with my general kind of position.
   Cutting purchases of liquid nitrogen for cancer research: very, very bad. But, note: quickly and rightly reversed.
   As for "sex education for transgender youth:" cut it. Cut it all. This will obviously be largely an initiative to advance progressive-left dogmas about sex and transgenderism. Trangenderism is pseudoscience. So this is rather like studying sex education among UFO abductees or people with multiple personalities or repressed memories, or victims of Satanic Ritual Abuse. If you're going to study anything at all about transgenderism, study how this pseudoscientific, ideological bit of mass sociogenic illness can be combatted.
   And, as for worthy projects with DEI in their proposals: the main problem here is that organizations like NIH forced DEI to be injected into proposals in order for funding to be granted. And almost none of the researchers pushed back. Now they're paying a price. These will have to be addressed on a case-by-case basis. If the researchers are willing to affirm that it was just boilerplate, that it can be expunged without undermining the project, and that they did it just because they had to, then I say restore the funding. Generally, however, projects that do actually have DEI as an essential component should be defunded.
   In addition to cutting waste, we're combatting ideological capture. The main damage has already been done by Democrats. Trump et al. are trying to fix it. This isn't easy, and there will be mistakes. Emphasizing those mistakes without the relevant context distorts the situation.
   Look, if some health researcher wants to study, say, "structural racism," let him submit his proposal. Most of that stuff is bullshit and should be rejected. But not necessarily out of hand. DEI is a characteristically leftist idea, however, in that it isn't just offered up as an ordinary idea alongside other ideas. Rather, it is injected into everything. It's treated as a kind of axiom that must be injected into all research, regardless of what it's on. This is one of the main reasons such leftist nonsense is so dangerous. Even when people start coming to their senses, it's very difficult to disentangle and extract it. Also, of course, it's not a matter of a few stupid research projects--it's now a pervasive dogma that Democrats forced into everything--this stuff about NIH barely scratches the surface. Democrats refused to fund any projects that didn't include some reference to this dogma. Now, TFP and similar pubs did criticize this--but the MSM didn't. They ignored or defended the madness. Now they're doing everything in their power to emphasize the difficulties and downsides of undoing this particular bit of progressive Lysenkoism.
   Nevertheless: there is reason to be concerned about how the administration is going about this.
   Also nevertheless, however: they tried gentler, more ordinary methods last time, and were thwarted by the very institutions and organizations they were trying to fix.
   This time around, they've decided that they can either rip off the band-aid...or let this lunatic ideology fester in them and, eventually, destroy them.

Sullum: Trump's Mass Cancellation of Student Visas Illustrates the Lawlessness of His Immigration Crackdown

I'm skeptical about some bits of this, but, overall, it seems pretty plausible, and is exactly the kind of thing many of us are worrying about.
   So far as I can tell, these foreign students are just being used as pawns in the administration's effort to get Harvard--and thereby academia--to change its ways. In general, the changes that strike me as necessary--so far as I can tell, the administration is trying to release universities from leftist ideological capture. Given the left's iron grip on academia, this is likely to require extreme measures--measures that many of us would not ordinarily countenance.
   Similarly, it seems that the administration will have to use extraordinary measures to upset Democrat's thus-far-extremely effective commitment to de facto open borders. Currently, their strategy seems to be to allow mass illegal immigration when they are in power, and then use lawfare, propaganda, etc. to block any efforts to undo their handiwork when Republicans are in power. And: it seems to be a lot easier to let in ten million illegal aliens than it is to get rid of, say, 25% of them...
   In a sense, the Democrats are now saying: we'll disregard and mutilate the law to let in a tidal wave of illegals...and we'll do everything we can to force you to stick strictly to the law with respect to getting rid of even some of them. Nobody thinks we have any chance of getting rid of all of them.
   At any rate, I'm torn between:
[1] My inherent aversion to authoritarianism of any kind, bending rules, making excuses for my side, and applying double standards.
and
[2] My suspicion that the left can't be beaten on these issues without bending the rules.

Add to this that I think two of the most effective ways of destroying the country are (a) destroying our universities and (b) mass immigration--especially if it's unregulated, from the Third World, and from basically one area.
   Also, as I've said, I think that the vanguard of the left--though certainly not the average Democrat in the street--aims to completely control universities (more or less as an end in itself)--and to destroy the USA. The extreme left is quite explicit about aiming to destroy the USA. There's no question about that. And they now set the agenda for the less-extreme, more-centrist left...that's now the Democrats got into the fix they're currently in--they've become the trailing edge of the radical left.
   Needless to say: in the future, I may look back on my ambivalent support for Trump as the biggest mistake of my political life.

Sheena Michelle Mason on Ending Racism by "Ending" Race: The Same Old Progressive-Left Race Nonsense

I haven't read the book, but I can tell from the review that it's just the same old nonsense again. The left just repeats slight variations on the same arguments over and over. I'll probably go through the arguments yet again. Most of it turns on:

[1] The mass of confusions called "social constructionism"
[2] Political correctness, the idea that facts/evidence/science should be subordinated to politics
[3] Confusions about natural kinds
[4] Some textbook fallacies including the continuum fallacy.

Races are real. They are natural biological kinds. That is: they are something roughly like generally phenotypically distinguishable groups with different most recent common ancestors than other such groups--or, maybe, something like homeostatic property clusters. They're clusters with fuzzy boundaries and borderline cases--so most of the alleged counterexamples (like Barack Obama) don't matter at all. And racism is irrelevant to the question. And, without a doubt, races do not depend on racism. In fact, the left's entire understanding of racism is as confused as its ideas about race...but I'm not going into that now.
   Anyway. The Left (i.e. the intellectual/cultural/political left) is radically confused about an astonishing number of things. None more than this stuff, I'd say.
   One last thing: note that Mason is a lit prof. She's not a biologist nor an anthropologist. She's not a philosopher of science. Her training is in a discipline known largely for two things: sloppy reasoning and intellectual capture (it should go without saying: by the left...) 

Dan McLaughlin: To Increase U.S. Manufacturing Jobs Use Defense Spending

I have long considered this to be inefficient...basically because I read somewhere once that defense jobs are too highly-skilled to efficiently do the relevant trick. But I have no real reason to think that's true. I'm for more defense spending and for more manufacturing jobs...so...maybe.