Saturday, December 16, 2017

Trump Judicial Nominee Doesn't Know Basic (?) Rules of Evidence

I trust Drum...but honestly, I have no idea whether these questions were things he should have known or not. They could be obscure for all I know...or the kinds of things that people commonly have to look up.
   Anybody know?
   Also, for the love of God, a simple I don't know is sufficient--and admirable. All this stumble-bumbling around is painful to listen to. Though I guess that's not the way it's played when Bullshit! is the game.


Blogger Pete Mack said...

It'd be one thing if he answered properly to some of the questions. He went o-for-ten. Kennedy is going to have to vote against him after that session.

8:54 PM  
Blogger Pete Mack said...

...he has to be pretty pissed off with the quality of nomination.

8:54 PM  
Blogger Winston Smith said...

Yeah, but until I know how hard the questions were, I don't know what to make of the 0/10 score...I mean, surely if they were all crazy obscure somebody would have mentioned that by now, though, right?

10:11 PM  
Blogger tehr0x0r said...

I've been lurking in the shadows for quite some time, but I shall return for this.

If you are an attorney who has ever set foot inside of a court room these were questions that you absolutely must know. It would be malpractice to represent a client in a trial if you didn't have a firm grip on those concepts.

11:34 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home