AJW: Mail-In Ballots Flip CA Election--But Reports of 25k Ballots With No Pratt Ballots Are False

Good. Because, as I said in an earlier post, that would be pretty clear evidence of shenanigans. Given that many ballots, even if there were zero Pratt supporters represented, you'd expect some Pratt votes merely as a result of errors. And remember: most of the people who return ballots don't really know anything about the race...

   Though, as Sean notes: CA election protocols are a complete freakin' joke. They're basically engineered to produce shit results shutting the Pubs even farther out of contention. And, of course, everybody who knows anything about elections knows that mail-in ballots are more susceptible to shenanigans. Basically the CA rules guarantee that the elections is dirty. And, of course: we've now actually caught Dems paying "Our Neighbors Temporarily Experiencing Houselessness" for their votes...