Gamergate 2.0?

Gamergate was a revolt against the Woketarian takeover of video games journalism. Needless to say, the freaks and grifters who had begun to take over sites like Kotaku did what the Woketarian cultist always do: they began shrieking hysterically about sexism, harassment, racism, blah blah blah. Needless to say, the then-already-wokifying mainstream media sided with the shrieking lefties. Wikipedia--which is now basically a left-wing propaganda site--claims without qualification that Gamergate was a harrassment campaign against women in video gaming. That is a lie.

   Note, incidentally, that the wikipedians can't even get past the title of the entry without editorializing. That title is:  "Gamergate (Harassment Campaign)"

   LOOOOOOOL

   Seriously, you can't make that shit up.

   Gamergate, round 2 is basically same shit, different day. Grifter organizations like "Sweet Baby Inc." and "Black Girl Gamers" assist companies in wokifying video games. This is what's going on, and there is simply no denying it. Gamers are now organizing to avoid these wokified games...and this is being described as harassment by these leftist companies and the MSM. 

   Here's one MSM story. What bullshit.

   Gamergate 1 actually had two components: (a) the wokification of video games journalism and (b) leftist grifter Zoe Quinn's attempts to redirect attention away from her grifting and high-profile infidelities. So Quinn and others like Anita Sarkeesian started screaming "harassment!" They alleged that they got loads of death threats--never proven--and so on. I have no doubt that they got some mean emails--that's SOP on the internet now. But that's not what Gamergate was. "Brianna" "Wu" also made such claims, but he was somewhat less central to the dust-up.

   If people would have taken Gamergate more seriously, we might not have been taken so by surprise when the SJW/Woke/neo-PCs erupted into our more serious institutions. 

   I did take it seriously--and there are quite a few posts on this blog to prove it.