Harris Endorses Equality Of Outcome...Ergo Marxism?

Legally enforced equality of outcome is where we're headed. If you don't realize that, you're simply not paying attention. Or you're still bamboozled into thinking that the Dems really aren't that far left. That's absolutely one of the...many, many...insane goals the left accepts...but can't quite admit to yet. They got you all to accept that women can be male just by shrieking it at you and calling you mean-sounding, made-up names. But you're still not quite ready for the Harrison Bergeron treatment yet. I mean, they'll need to take your guns first, for one thing...which is right at the top of the agenda as soon as the they take power. Believe me, that was their M.O. in the OD. They've already said they want to do it, and actually tried to do it here--but got so much pushback that they backed off of it--for now. They'll have to shift the Overton window leftward just a little bit more... Once they've got your guns, in violation of the Second Amendment, where is it, exactly, that you think they'll stop? The First Amendment? LOOOOOL  They've already made it quite clear that they want to get rid of that. Freedom of association is already gone. Then the right to self-defense. Then free speech. All those aims are already common on the intellectual left--and that's where the crazy trickles down from. 

Anyway, they're clearly committed to equality of outcome. This isn't anything new:

Why would a vice presidential candidate seemingly endorse full-on Marxism days before a general election? Does she believe government should enforce equality of outcome for everyone? Seriously?

— Andrew Sullivan (@sullydish) November 1, 2020