Do Most People Still Believe In The Russiagate Hoax?
I guess it wouldn't surprise me a whole lot. Most people have very little idea what's going on. Which is, undoubtedly, largely why we're in the mess we're in. It's also why it's so destructive that the media flings charges rightward with such abandon. Even when they do deign to retract them, it doesn't seem to have much effect. But this doesn't seem to be a clean case, as the question seems to have been phrased like so:
First: "Was real in its findings"? I guess they mean "was true"...but why not use actual, y'know, English phrasing? Also, I'm not even sure yet that it was Dem oppo research + dezinformatsiya. I mean, it's looking that way. But I'm not straight on it all yet. Even if true, few people know it. So it's a bad contrast. Better would have been something like: Are the accusations in the Steele Dossier more likely mostly true or mostly false? The actual question above seems like it's mostly designed as a way of informing people of (or at least getting them to believe) the second disjunct. Sloppy, politically motivated, dumb.
First: "Was real in its findings"? I guess they mean "was true"...but why not use actual, y'know, English phrasing? Also, I'm not even sure yet that it was Dem oppo research + dezinformatsiya. I mean, it's looking that way. But I'm not straight on it all yet. Even if true, few people know it. So it's a bad contrast. Better would have been something like: Are the accusations in the Steele Dossier more likely mostly true or mostly false? The actual question above seems like it's mostly designed as a way of informing people of (or at least getting them to believe) the second disjunct. Sloppy, politically motivated, dumb.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home