Tuesday, August 21, 2018
Previous Posts
- Mob Tears Down Silent Sam
- McGahn Did Not Incriminate Trump
- Benjamin Wallace-Wells: "John McCain And The End O...
- Giuliani: "Truth Isn't Truth"
- Listen And Believe?: #MeToo Star Asia Argento Paid...
- PC/Pomo/New Age
- Rahm Emanuel Makes The Mistake Of Saying Something...
- Snowballs Banned By Snowflakes
- Singal: "Is It Racist To Refer To Space Colonizati...
- 'Dog' Is Not A Racial Slur
Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]
3 Comments:
It is not an open and shut case: obesity has a huge external cost to society, in increased medical insurance costs, lost work days, etc. Soda is dirt cheap to make, with a great markups so taxing it is not completely unreasonable. A better solution is to eliminate all subsidies on sugar and corn syrup, which would make healthier food relatively more competitive
I agree with the last part, man.
But, as for the first part: that also goes for eating meat, eating too much (ergo serving meat and big portions at restaurants), not exercising, taking certain supplements...and a whole lotta other stuff, too. I don't disagree that the public good can be served in an important sense by such regulations--I'm saying that there's no sense in which soda is special... except that liberals hate it because it's gauche. And that slope is slippery as hell. In fact, it's not even a slope, it's a cliff.
Soda, like popcorn at movie theaters is where a restaurant's profit lies, and restaurants are already running on thin margins. With $15/hr wages for front of the house staff how are they to stay in business?
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home