I like that, right off the bat, the so-called "rational" wiki fully endorses the false equivalence with "not being a jackass" which makes the PC crowd most cultishly dangerous.
'Cause now, if you oppose their censorship efforts, you're just a bad person. And so the snowball begins to roll downhill.
There's an important difference, of course. Nobody denied that.
What's being denied is "Rational"wiki's attempt to identify being PC with merely not being a jackass...thus falsely equating being critical of PC with *being* a jackass...
3 Comments:
I like that, right off the bat, the so-called "rational" wiki fully endorses the false equivalence with "not being a jackass" which makes the PC crowd most cultishly dangerous.
'Cause now, if you oppose their censorship efforts, you're just a bad person. And so the snowball begins to roll downhill.
Cause we all know slippery slope arguments dont have any flaws.
Theres a difference between being censored and being heard but then called a jackass.
There's an important difference, of course. Nobody denied that.
What's being denied is "Rational"wiki's attempt to identify being PC with merely not being a jackass...thus falsely equating being critical of PC with *being* a jackass...
A common type of sophistry there...
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home