GamerGate, Pro- and Anti-
posted by Winston Smith at
8:31 AM
Monday, October 20, 2014
Previous Posts
- "Borderism" is "Problematic"
- Imagine a GOP-Controlled Senate...
- The Virus You Should Really Be Worrying About
- Jacob Zuma Wants Corruption Charges Dropped Becaus...
- Do Clines Cluster?
- The Killer Whale...
- The Mystic On Islamic Doctrine
- Sam Harris: The End Of Liberalism?
- What Are Bill Mahr (and Sam Harris) and Ben Afflec...
- State Trooper Preached About Jesus During Traffic ...
Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]
6 Comments:
Next up: Genghis Khan: Pro and Con.
At least your consistent, DA... I'll give that to ya...
I've gotta say, context matters here. While the first article has a point, it is completely lost in the buckets of bullshit that the second describes. Gamergate started out as revenge from an Ex. The result is predictable.
If you want to complain about corruption in videogame journals, go ahead. But don't call it gamergate. And don't try to convince me it's a big proble lm compared to, say, internet trolls who threaten to rape women.
From what I've read, this is definitely not a "both sides have good points!" debate. See, for example,
ars technica
The headline that says it all:
A Summary Of The Gamergate Movement That We Will Immediately Change If Any Of Its Members Find Any Details Objectionable
At least your consistent, DA... I'll give that to ya...
You sure know how to pick them, as the archbishop said to the mendicant.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home