Monday, October 20, 2014

GamerGate, Pro- and Anti-

6 Comments:

Blogger Dark Avenger said...

Next up: Genghis Khan: Pro and Con.

6:14 PM  
Blogger Winston Smith said...

At least your consistent, DA... I'll give that to ya...

6:33 PM  
Blogger Pete Mack said...

I've gotta say, context matters here. While the first article has a point, it is completely lost in the buckets of bullshit that the second describes. Gamergate started out as revenge from an Ex. The result is predictable.
If you want to complain about corruption in videogame journals, go ahead. But don't call it gamergate. And don't try to convince me it's a big proble lm compared to, say, internet trolls who threaten to rape women.

10:13 PM  
Anonymous cb said...

From what I've read, this is definitely not a "both sides have good points!" debate. See, for example,
ars technica

9:54 AM  
Blogger Dark Avenger said...

The headline that says it all:

A Summary Of The Gamergate Movement That We Will Immediately Change If Any Of Its Members Find Any Details Objectionable

12:59 PM  
Blogger Dark Avenger said...

At least your consistent, DA... I'll give that to ya...

You sure know how to pick them, as the archbishop said to the mendicant.

4:14 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home