The Navy Yard Shooter Should Not Have Been Permitted to Own Firearms

It's hard for me to imagine that anyone would seriously deny the proposition that the Navy Yard shooter is exactly the kind of person who should not be allowed to own firearms.

He had a history of using firearms in property crimes (e.g. shooting out people's tires, shooting through the floor of his apartment, seemingly at the person who lived below him). I don't see how anyone could reasonably argue that he shouldn't have lost his right to own guns after the tire incident alone.