Carter v. Bush
If they weren't assiduously running the country into a ditch, I might find the Bushies' shrill responses to Carter's criticisms amusing. Note to the administration: calling someone "irrelevant" doesn't make their criticism false. And, by the way, isn't this the same lame-ass response they used when Dean asserted that the shenanigans of this administration were "worse than Watergate"?
Maybe what they're mad about is the fact that, after years of running Carter into the ground and deifying Bush, it's become clear to everyone that Carter was ten times the president Bush is. That must be rather a bitter pill to swallow.
If they weren't assiduously running the country into a ditch, I might find the Bushies' shrill responses to Carter's criticisms amusing. Note to the administration: calling someone "irrelevant" doesn't make their criticism false. And, by the way, isn't this the same lame-ass response they used when Dean asserted that the shenanigans of this administration were "worse than Watergate"?
Maybe what they're mad about is the fact that, after years of running Carter into the ground and deifying Bush, it's become clear to everyone that Carter was ten times the president Bush is. That must be rather a bitter pill to swallow.
posted by Winston Smith at
9:22 AM
1 Comments:
It gets even better, the RNC spokeswoman said that "it was hard to take Carter seriously because he also "challenged Ronald Reagan's strategy for the Cold War.""
Ah yes, because spending so much money that to this day our nation is still in debt was a great plan.
I agree with Carter's initial statement, but it looks like he is backing off of it Clicky Just when I started to think he had a backbone he proves me wrong.
Sigh, oh well...
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home