Friday, July 07, 2006

Inherit the Wind: Ann Coulter, Flatulent Raccoons, and Evolution

As you know, I'm not much of a fan of the left end of the political spectrum. Even liberals (i.e. center-left types)--the political group of whom I'm currently most fond--tend to bug me a fair amount of the time.

Anyway, as a more-or-less liberal, I'm prone to try to find fault with my own position and identify the virtues of those with whom I disagree.

But there's just not any real doubt about it: American liberals are, as a kind of collective whole, way, way less crazy than American conservatives.

Is this because American liberals are particularly sane? Maybe in part. But it's mostly because American conservativism is home to so many total whack jobs. And I'm not picking out obscure nuts here, as both sides have more than their share of those.

I'm talking about the folks who count as political superstars.

I'm talking about, for example, Ann Coulter.

Now, you probably thought that she just couldn't get any dumber. I know that's what I thought. But we were wrong, as this post at Media Matters demonstrates.

You see, in her wild-eyed, spittle-flecked crusade to discredit everything liberal, Ms. Coulter has decided to take on the theory of evolution--something about which, as it turns out, she understands nothing.

It's a truly embarrassing performance by Coulter. It's not even clear that she knows as much about evolution as the average undergraduate. She's obviously not qualified to even, say, give an introductory lecture on the subject, much less refute its central theory. Of course her fans will eat it up, as they don't know--and don't want to know--any better.

There's no liberal equivalent of Ann Coulter. That's faint praise for American liberals, of course...but it's more than can currently be said in favor of American conservatives.

6 Comments:

Blogger Tom Van Dyke said...

Center-left is OK by me. They'll end up running this country sooner or later, likely sooner if the GOP keeps carrying on.

But who is center-left? I have no clue. Give me something to work with here, WS.

The entire left and much of the Democratic Party leadership is the equivalent of Ann Coulter. That's why she stands out to you, because she fills (to her profit) a demand for rhetorical violence on the right, for those who demand such things. You give it away for free, because supply exceeds demand.

BTW, an "extremist" is anyone who supports or is opposed to the Iraq War. ;-)

5:28 AM  
Blogger Winston Smith said...

Jeez, Tom, you should at least try to make your claims vaguely plausible.

There's no real left in this country. What we have is one extreme right-wing party and a center-left party. Coulter and the Republican leadership are far farther right than almost any notable liberal figures. To be the equivalent of the GOP Gang that Couldn't Lead Straight, we'd have to have a socilalist party, which we don't, really.

The closest to an Ann Coulter figure the Dems have is, I guess, Michael Moore, who's not even half as extreme or loony. You guys like to bring up Ted Rall, who almost nobody's ever even heard of.

7:05 AM  
Blogger Tom Van Dyke said...

No, WS, you have it backwards. Everyone to the left of me, not the right of you, is the extremist.

6:29 PM  
Blogger Winston Smith said...

Oh...I get it...

11:17 PM  
Blogger James Redekop said...

The closest analog on the left I've been able to think of to Ann Coulter is Ward Churchill.

By the way, Ann's writing on evolution was based on consultations with William Dembski, one of the leading lights in the Intelligent Design movement. He is apparently quite pleased with her work on the subject.

11:42 PM  
Blogger Winston Smith said...

Good point. Churchill is a good analogy.

But, as many of us have noted before, Churchill is a complete unknown...or, rather, somebody who's known basically only b/c of the (justifiable, IMO) outrage in response to his so-called work.

Coulter is hugely famous, and famous largely because of her FANS...and because she's a regular on serious news shows.

Every party/political orientation has its isolated kooks. We can't blame 'em for that. But we CAN blame them if they have a superabundance of famous, popular kooks.

6:19 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home