Thursday, July 28, 2005
Previous Posts
- I Am ReturnedBack from lovely MO, where the temper...
- Jeffrey Rosen is Cautiously Optimistic About John ...
- He's a Uniter, Not a DividerWell, at least he seem...
- Help Us, Obi-Wan Clark--You're Our Only HopeGood, ...
- Where the Goalposts Used to BeA very, very differe...
- Trouble for TurdblossomThings just keep looking wo...
- Swearing on "The Holy Scriptures" in North Carolin...
- Duke Basketball Report--Like Everything Else With ...
- TeeVee Says Reagan Greatest AmericanThis is too st...
- Rich on IraqGateFrank Rich certainly does rule. Al...
Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]
2 Comments:
Aside from Toles' predictable Bush snark, a new Iraq constitution that assigns second-class status to women re divorce rights per shari'a is indeed troubling.
But what do we do? Isn't self-determination the underlying principle of democracy, consent of the governed? What if all the men and half the women are cool with this?
Do we still attempt to exercise a cultural imperialism, "knowing" that the emancipation of women is inherently just?
Nothing ever comes easy. Damn. Thanks for introducing me to fallibilism, WS, the question of how to proceed in the absence of moral certainty. Moral dilemmas truly suck.
I hear ya, brother. Welcome to my world.
This is why I thought that we should aim for liberal (in the broad sense) government in the ME first, and democracy later...
Anyway, I'd strip the "scare quotes" off of 'know'. Seems to me that we know that the emancipation of women is inherently just...and I'll be you agree.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home