They're never tentative, never uncertain, and never wrong--they're utterly dogmatic...until, in rare cases, they are absolutely forced to recognize that they might be vulnerable to criticism...then they do what they need to do to defend against that. It's not the falsehood that bothers them, nor their own stupidity nor dogmatism. It's getting busted--losing debating points. They don't want to get owned by the Cons. That's what it comes down to.
No comments:
Post a Comment